China Unicom (the Claimant) was unsuccessful in substantiating their claims in the arbitration case against DMIT (the Respondent) for the provision of services AS4837 and AS10099, valued at half a million US Dollars. Ultimately, it was determined that CUA should reimburse DMIT $x2,880.xx(5 digits) USD in the practical terms.
Initially, DMIT had entered into a significant contract with CUA for close to half a million dollars with the aim of joint development and exploring new market opportunities.
However, our plans changed due to unforeseen issues. CUA failed to fulfill the agreed-upon services and unilaterally altered the order, leading to the failed of DMIT's operations in San Jose and degrading our service quality in Tokyo.
CUA denied all liability and sought an arbitration ruling to compel DMIT to reimburse CUA for the full contract value.
As a leading provider of optimized routing solutions from the US to China, DMIT is disheartened by these events and the unreasonable business practices adopted by CUA. We regret to inform that we probably will no longer be working with CUA moving forward.
DMIT wants to share this story to all our partners; stay alert.
t.me/DMIT_INC
/1006
323 viewsedited
May 5 at 11:15
机翻:
中国联通(申请人)在针对 DMIT(被申请人)提供 AS4837 和 AS10099 服务、价值 50 万美元的仲裁案中未能证实其主张。最终,确定CUA应实际偿还DMIT $x2,880.xx(5位数字)美元。