Among other things, the costs associated with IP null-routing have
been reduced (Section 3(e) of the ToS).
In the Terms of Service exists a provision for Service Violation Fees.
To date we have not levied a fee under that provision. However, over
the past couple of months we have seen a very sharp increase in the
number of abuse incidents we've needed to handle. Particularly those
related to copyright violations.
Starting next month we will begin assessing fees for handling excessive
numbers of abuse complaints. The motivation is to encourage our
customers to remove those recurring problem customers from their
servers.
We do understand that abuse issues crop up from time to time;
especially for those that are reselling services. We have no desire
to assess administrative fees on accounts which generally maintain
an acceptable level of complaints.
To that end, before deciding to assess a fee we will consider the
number of servers on the account as well as the number of complaints
received during the previous 30 days.作者: 瘦够了 时间: 2010-11-23 12:25
额,T2是便宜出机器,然后用罚款赚钱作者: l4steleven 时间: 2010-11-23 12:25
神马意思? 求翻译作者: 小夜 时间: 2010-11-23 12:27
。。。难道这就是传说中的奸商敛财手段?作者: Globalization 时间: 2010-11-23 12:29
处罚滥用?作者: eben 时间: 2010-11-23 12:31
难道这就是传说中的奸商敛财手段?作者: 苁林老鬼 时间: 2010-11-23 12:33 大家都不去用他了 他还 罚什么啊作者: aru 时间: 2010-11-23 12:35
大概就是每月超过多少起投诉就会进行罚款,主要是针对版权方面的。
也就是说,偶然一两次大概不会罚作者: 美国VPS 时间: 2010-11-23 16:04
burst已经被罚怕了。。作者: yc260982 时间: 2010-11-23 16:09
狗奸作者: yang 时间: 2010-11-23 17:01