全球主机交流论坛

标题: 独服@i7-2600 [打印本页]

作者: observer 时间: 2011-4-21 18:30
标题: 独服@i7-2600
果然名不虚传，性能有点小虎，单核居然有1800+分
这是去除了IO的分数，秀一下

./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8
make all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/unixbench-5.1.2'
Checking distribution of files
./pgms  exists
./src  exists
./testdir  exists
./tmp  exists
./results  exists
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/unixbench-5.1.2'
sh: 3dinfo: not found

# #  # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #
# #  ## #  # #  #          # #  #    ## #  # #  # #
# #  # #  #  # ##          ##### ##### # #  #  #    ######
# #  #  # #  # ##          # #  #    #  # #  #    # #
# #  # ##  # #  #          # #  #    # ##  # #  # #
#### # #  #  # #       ##### ######  # # #### # #

Version 5.1.2                   Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version                Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                    Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007                johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Process Creation  1 2 3

8 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: 218489.burst.app-base.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.35-22-generic -- #34-Ubuntu SMP Sun Oct 10 09:26:05 UTC 2010
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.4 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 5: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 6: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
      Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
02:41:10 up  6:48,  2 users,  load average: 9.64, 17.91, 11.59; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 21 2011 02:41:10 - 03:02:03
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    37821128.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   4041.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            4497.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                            2491942.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                239984.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            19442.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                11689.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                4867.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      4365438.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0 37821128.8 3240.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    4041.8 734.9
Execl Throughput                               43.0    4497.3 1045.9
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 2491942.2 2003.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0    239984.0 600.0
Process Creation                               126.0    19442.4 1543.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    11689.2 2756.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    4867.0 8111.7
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 4365438.2 2910.3
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                      1885.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 21 2011 03:02:03 - 03:23:04
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables    163484593.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                   27558.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                            31942.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                         10884466.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching             2547238.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                            95259.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                46633.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                6099.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                      9815086.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index             BASELINE    RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       116700.0  163484593.0  14009.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                      55.0    27558.6 5010.7
Execl Throughput                               43.0    31942.1 7428.4
Pipe Throughput                            12440.0 10884466.9 8749.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                4000.0 2547238.2 6368.1
Process Creation                               126.0    95259.2 7560.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   42.4    46633.8  10998.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6.0    6099.2  10165.3
System Call Overhead                         15000.0 9815086.0 6543.4
                                                               ========
System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                      8161.6

作者: yugongtian 时间: 2011-4-21 18:34
5.13 看看

作者: jacksoking 时间: 2011-4-21 18:36
强烈要求赞助

作者: chris1914 时间: 2011-4-21 18:36
I7 當然要買 i7 990x

作者: observer 时间: 2011-4-21 18:41

原帖由 chris1914 于 2011-4-21 18:36 发表
I7 當然要買 i7 990x

i7 990x那个谁家有？有也是天价

i7-2600是Sandy Bridge架构，节电+单U便宜，一般来说服务商会给较低的价格

作者: wjhhxl 时间: 2011-4-21 18:42
强啊！！！！

作者: moto72 时间: 2011-4-21 18:46
求暂住

作者: Showfom 时间: 2011-4-21 18:55
为啥要去除IO……

作者: woaijay987 时间: 2011-4-21 18:58
4楼最近很有钱么？
我现在还记得那天为了1美元来讨债的口气......

作者: observer 时间: 2011-4-21 19:00

原帖由 Showfom 于 2011-4-21 18:55 发表
为啥要去除IO……

因为IO环境不一样会导致分数差别很大，不能很好地反映性能，而且人家unixbench的发布帖就号召去除IO的发布，我就跟风了。
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=924581

作者: Porter 时间: 2011-4-21 19:02
IO难道不属于性能的一部分吗？

作者: cw723 时间: 2011-4-21 19:02
I7-2600不知道为什么不支持VT.对此我很蛋疼

作者: chris1914 时间: 2011-4-21 19:04

原帖由 woaijay987 于 2011-4-21 18:58 发表
4楼最近很有钱么？
我现在还记得那天为了1美元来讨债的口气......

1元不是錢.?

作者: chris1914 时间: 2011-4-21 19:04

原帖由 observer 于 2011-4-21 18:41 发表

i7 990x那个谁家有？有也是天价

i7-2600是Sandy Bridge架构，节电+单U便宜，一般来说服务商会给较低的价格

1m左右

作者: woaijay987 时间: 2011-4-21 19:08

原帖由 chris1914 于 2011-4-21 19:04 发表

1元不是錢.?

没有，我只是说当时你买我的vps都要欠我钱，没想到现在摇身一变，都买128g内存的独服了。。
我们大陆的穷人很佩服。

作者: observer 时间: 2011-4-21 19:13

原帖由 Porter 于 2011-4-21 19:02 发表
IO难道不属于性能的一部分吗？

是啊，但是IO子系统一般都是分开测的，因为IO一般是瓶颈，需要非常重视

并在一起测的话，个人认为无法很好地让我鉴别一台服务器的性能。

作者: chris1914 时间: 2011-4-21 19:23

原帖由 woaijay987 于 2011-4-21 19:08 发表

没有，我只是说当时你买我的vps都要欠我钱，没想到现在摇身一变，都买128g内存的独服了。。
我们大陆的穷人很佩服。

128 GB RAM 不買了..聽了大家的意見~..

作者: woaijay987 时间: 2011-4-21 19:47

原帖由 chris1914 于 2011-4-21 19:23 发表

128 GB RAM 不買了..聽了大家的意見~..

买个32G也不错啊。而且你不是说你的128G交了钱？这么简单就能退掉啊？

作者: baqfhwqqq 时间: 2011-4-21 19:52

原帖由 woaijay987 于 2011-4-21 19:08 发表

没有，我只是说当时你买我的vps都要欠我钱，没想到现在摇身一变，都买128g内存的独服了。。
我们大陆的穷人很佩服。

求图求真相。

作者: chris1914 时间: 2011-4-21 21:18

原帖由 woaijay987 于 2011-4-21 19:47 发表

买个32G也不错啊。而且你不是说你的128G交了钱？这么简单就能退掉啊？

我何時說有交過錢...?

作者: Ultratude 时间: 2011-4-21 23:03
Datashack.net 的？

欢迎光临全球主机交流论坛 (https://lilynana.eu.org/)